Government Agencies Hold 46% of REO Inventory…and More Is Coming

bank owned photo

Haven’t we been discussing this for months??? Where is the inventory… whoop there it is!

06/28/2010 By: Carrie Bay at DSNews.com

As the GSEs and other federal agencies involved in housing finance sell their collective inventory of repossessed homes, they will generate significant pressure on prices, according to a new report from the real estate analytics firm Radar Logic. And with an even larger share of government-backed loans in the delinquency pipeline, their influence over home prices could last for years, the New York-based company says.

Based on Radar Logic’s analysis, the federal government’s REO inventory — including homes owned by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD, and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) — has increased steadily for over 24 months and now accounts for approximately 46 percent of the nation’s total REO supply.

bank owned photo Looking at information from the GSEs and HUD, Radar Logic says the government currently owns 209,500 homes as a result of foreclosure, and the company estimates there could be an additional 9,560 homes held by the VA, for a total of 219,060 government-owned foreclosed homes.

In addition to the glut of homes already tagged as REOs, there is a growing number of non-performing loans soon heading for foreclosure that will raise the government’s stake in distressed property ownership significantly.

According to estimates by Zillow and Lender Processing Services, 2.3 million U.S. homeowners are 30 to 90 days delinquent on their mortgages. Based on data from the

U.S. Treasury Department, Radar Logic estimates that 69 percent of these mortgages are owned or guaranteed by the GSEs, the FHA, or the VA.

In its calculations, Radar Logic assumes that 35 percent of these mortgages will be cured or end in short sales rather than becoming REO, which means 1 million of these homes will enter the federal government’s REO inventory.

Another 5 million homeowners are more than 90 days delinquent or already in the process of foreclosure. Data from the Treasury indicates that 56 percent of these loans are owned or guaranteed by federal agencies. Assuming again that 35 percent will result in delinquency cures or short sales, Radar Logic projects 1.8 million of these homes to be added to the government’s REO holdings.

Taken together, there are currently 3.1 million homes in the federal government’s REO inventory or headed toward it, Radar Logic concludes.

“For over a year now we have been saying that the GSEs and other Federal agencies will play a critical role in the success or failure of the housing recovery due to their huge holdings of foreclosed homes,” said Michael Feder, Radar Logic’s president and CEO. “Now their role is more critical than ever before. The potential cost to taxpayers resulting from the government’s current policies is enormous. We can’t help but wonder if there isn’t a better approach.”

Assuming an average mortgage balance of $200,000, the book value of these homes could ultimately reach $614 billion, according to Radar Logic’s report. In most cases, the government will have to sell its REO inventory at a significant discount, on average 40 percent less than book value, which Radar Logic says means taxpayers stand to lose $246 billion.

In addition, assuming a similar discount relative to loan value in short sales, if 25 percent of the government’s foreclosure pipeline is liquidated as a pre-foreclosure sale, taxpayers will lose another $88 billion, based on Radar Logic’s calculations.

Taking both short sales and REO sales into account, that puts total losses from the government’s holdings of distressed properties in the neighborhood of $333 billion.

People optimistic about economy (Really? Who is she speaking too?)

sale photo

I’m not sure about this story and I would love to hear your take on it… please leave a comment and let me know your thoughts.

CALIFORNIA: Consumer confidence index shows a slight increase, according to a quarterly survey. – By TIFFANY RAY – The Press-Enterprise

Californians are feeling better about the economy than they were a few months ago, but they continue to hold back on big-ticket spending, according to a recent survey by Chapman University.

Increasing optimism here comes despite stagnating consumer sentiments nationally, a similar report showed.

Chapman’s quarterly survey of consumer confidence registered a California consumer confidence index at 82.7 for May, up from 81.1 in February. It’s the third consecutive increase since August 2009, when the consumer confidence level was 69.2.

sale photo

Survey: Californians buck the U.S. trend in consumer confidence.

Still, an index score of 100 means there is an equal percentage of consumers who are optimistic about the economy to consumers who are pessimistic about it, so a score below 100 indicates that most consumers are still skittish about the economy.

Nationally, consumer confidence was stagnant between February and May, according studies by the University of Michigan. Nationally, consumer sentiments were improved in May over last summer, but the Chapman survey indicates improvement has been more dramatic in California.

Chapman economist Esmael Adibi said recent data suggest home prices are starting to improve, and that could be contributing to Californians’ rising optimism. The state’s housing market took a disproportionate hit during the recession, he said, but “that should disproportionately help us when prices come back.”

Still, Adibi cautioned that, although confidence is improving, there are still more pessimists than optimists. “It is still below what it should be,” he said.

Consumers were far more confident in the future than in what’s happening currently, the Chapman survey showed. Sentiments about the current economy registered at 66 on the May index. By comparison, the outlook for future economic conditions hit 105.1.

The survey’s consumer spending index fell in May to 71.4, from 89.6 in February, meaning fewer respondents said they were planning to buy expensive items such as cars and washing machines.

Similarly, a quarterly forecast from the Marcus & Millichap real estate firm predicted retail spending will remain soft in the Inland region despite some improvement in the economy overall. Auto industry retiree Chuck Neal said things are getting worse: Small businesses can’t get loans, and people aren’t spending money because they are still afraid of losing their jobs.

Cindy Monahan, a Mentone resident who works in a Riverside dental lab, said things aren’t going to get better until people have jobs.

“I know people who are in houses who haven’t made a payment in two years,” Monahan said.

Nancy D. Sidhu, chief economist with the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corp., said there are “a number of interesting cross-currents going on where consumer sentiment is involved.”

People are reminded each month that unemployment remains high, Sidhu said. But other measures economists follow are showing signs of recovery.

Container traffic in and out of ports and Inland warehouses has increased, in some cases dramatically, Sidhu said. And auto sales, although “nothing to write home about yet,” are mostly better than they were a year ago, she said.

Nationally, retail sales have improved, a sign that people who still have jobs have stopped being afraid, Sidhu said.

“That, I think, is the key,” Sidhu said. “Last year there was an enormous amount of fear, and people weren’t quite sure how to handle this deep recession we were in.”

Reach Tiffany Ray at 951-368-9559 or at tray@PE.com

So I’m curious… after all this, where to you think the economy is and where do you believe that it’s headed? Stay tuned.

New home sales plummet to record low!

chart_new_home_sales2.top

By Hibah Yousuf, staff reporter June 23, 2010: 11:25 AM ET

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — New home sales plummeted to a record low in May, the first month following the expiration of the home-buyer tax credit. This snapped a two-month streak of gains.

chart_new_home_sales2.top

New home sales declined 32.7% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 300,000 last month, down from an downwardly revised 446,000 in April, the Commerce Department reported Wednesday. Sales year-over-year fell 18.3%.

This is the slowest sales pace since the Commerce Department began tracking data in 1963. The prior record was set in September 1981, when new homes sold at an annual rate of 338,000.

“We expected a slowdown, but the extent of this decline was a surprise,” said Anika Khan, an economist at Wells Fargo. The figure was even worse than her relatively pessimistic forecast of an annual rate of 380,000 in May.

A consensus of economists surveyed by Briefing.com had expected May sales to slide to an annual rate of 430,000.

“Clearly, the lack of a tax credit had a lot to do with it, and it’s going to be a bit of a bumpy road ahead as we get a few more months of payback,” Khan said.

Home sales had surged in March and April as homebuyers scrambled to sign contracts ahead of the April 30 deadline for the tax credit. First-time homebuyers qualified for a tax credit up to $8,000, while repeat buyers could get as much as a $6,500 break.

Homebuyers have until June 30 to close deals, but the Senate may vote to push that deadline back to Sept. 30.

Khan expects home sales to remain depressed through the third quarter as home construction continues to contract and lending standards remain tight. But, she said, sales should pick up slightly in the fourth quarter.

Although, she added, we are still years away from a normal level of new home sales — an annual rate between 800,000 and 900,000.

“A full housing recovery is contingent on employment,” Khan said. “When we see the unemployment rate abate, and some growth in salaries and incomes, we’ll get some sustainable momentum in the housing market.”

A real estate industry report released earlier this week showed that existing home sales, based closed sales rather than signed contracts, slipped slightly last month but remained elevated.

Price and inventory: The government report showed that the median price of new homes sold in May was $200,900, down less than 1% from April but a 9.6% drop from May 2009.

An estimated 213,000 new homes were for sale at the end of May, the lowest inventory level in more than 40 years.

Still, at the current sales pace, the government expects it will take 8.5 months to sell through that inventory, up from 5.8 months in April. Six months of inventory is considered normal market conditions.

Sales by region:
Sales fell the most in the West, where they decreased by more than 50%; the Northwest saw sales declined by about a third. Sales in the South and Midwest declined by about 25%.

Update… Still not signed but hopeful that this will be addressed!

Due to the challenges associated with purchasing short sale and foreclosure properties, many home buyers who signed contracts prior to April 30 to take advantage of the federal home buyer tax credit are concerned escrow may not close prior to the June 30 deadline. As a result, the Senate added an amendment to a bill this week that, if approved, will extend the deadline to close to Sept. 30, 2010. If the Senate passes the bill, it will go back to the House of Representatives for approval prior to reaching the president’s desk for his signature.

Troubled homeowners find help outside Obama program

LA 144853.jpg

Great article explaining the continued challenges with Loan Modifications and our current state of affairs.

More mortgages were permanently modified in May under the government program, but more modifications were canceled as well. Some of those borrowers worked out alternative terms with private lenders.

LA 144853.jpg

A distressed home awaits a buyer in Davie, Fla. Mortgage servicers have been pressured by the government to make more loan modifications permanent. (J Pat Carter, Associated Press / May 12, 2010)
By Jim Puzzanghera, Los Angeles Times

Reporting from Washington —

More borrowers dropped out of the Obama administration’s foreclosure prevention program last month than were added, but many of those homeowners found private help from their mortgage companies, according to data released Monday.

The number of mortgages with permanently reduced payments under the Home Affordable Modification Program increased 15% in May to 340,459. The pace of new temporary three-month modifications eased in May, with an increase of just 2.5% to 1,244,184.

But cancellations of mortgage modifications continued to grow. Canceled trial modifications rose 55% in May from April. More than a third of all trial modifications started since the program began last year — 429,696 — now have been canceled.

Cancellations of permanent modifications also were up sharply, rising 70% to 6,357 in May from April.

But overall, homeowners with permanently reduced mortgage payments have fared better in the program. The cancellations amount to just 1.8% of all the permanent modifications offered since the program began last year.

The administration’s report said that at the eight largest mortgage servicers, including Bank of America, CitiMortgage and JPMorgan Chase, nearly half of homeowners whose temporary government modifications were cancelled received an alternative modification.

Of the 194,056 total cancellations for those servicers under the Obama administration’s plan, just 7% resulted in foreclosure actions. An additional 2% resulted in a short sale.

The Los Angeles-Orange County area continued to account for the most active trial and permanent modifications under the administration program, with 52,119, or 6.4% of the national total. The New York City area was second with 6.1%. The Inland Empire ranked fourth with 5%.

The $75-billion Home Affordable Modification Program offers mortgage servicers cash incentives to reduce mortgage holders’ payments. The goal is to modify the mortgages for 3 million to 4 million people by the end of 2012. The median payment reduction in permanent modifications has been about $500 a month.

But the program has been criticized for not helping enough homeowners and for slow participation and bureaucratic runarounds by major mortgage servicers.

Administration officials increased pressure on mortgage servicers in December to make more of the modifications permanent.

As part of that process, the administration reviewed cases in which some servicers denied mortgage modifications. Officials agreed with most of the decisions, but in 3.9% of the cases, reviewers disagreed with the servicers’ decisions and ordered the firms to hold off on foreclosure action until the cases were reevaluated.

jim.puzzanghera@latimes.com
Copyright © 2010, The Los Angeles Times

High default rate seen for modified mortgages – As seen in the Wall Street Journal

By JAMES R. HAGERTY

Fitch Ratings Ltd. forecasts that most borrowers who get lower mortgage payments under a federal government program will default within 12 months.

Among those with loans that aren’t backed by any federal agency, the redefault rate within a year is likely to be 65% to 75% under the Obama administration’s Home Affordable Modification Program, or HAMP, according to a report to be released Wednesday by Fitch, a New York-based credit-rating firm. Almost all of those who got loan modifications have already defaulted once.

Diane Pendley, a managing director at Fitch, said the failure rate was likely to be high largely because most of these borrowers were mired in credit-card debt, car loans and other obligations.

Backsliding

The Treasury Department has said that among people who have been given loan modifications under HAMP, the median ratio of total debt payments to pretax income is still 64%. That often means little money is left over for food, clothing or such emergency expenses as medical care and car repairs.

“The borrower remains in a very high-risk situation,” Ms. Pendley said in an interview. “The other debts don’t go away.”

A Treasury official said HAMP “is making a real difference in the lives of hundreds of thousands of homeowners.” He said the government has reduced the risk of redefault by offering financial incentives to borrowers who remain current on loan payments.

Fitch based the redefault forecast on the performance of loans that were modified in the first quarter of 2009. Those modifications were done outside of HAMP, which took effect later in the year. But Ms. Pendley doesn’t expect a major difference between the results of HAMP modifications and those made under lenders’ programs.

Even if two-thirds of the loan modifications fail, Ms. Pendley said, that doesn’t mean HAMP is a failure. “If you can save one-third of the borrowers, I think it is worth the exercise,” she said. She also said the HAMP program, announced in early 2009, had provided a basic outline for loan servicers to follow in modifying loans. Loan servicers, often owned by banks, collect payments and handle foreclosures. Previously they were “all over the place” in their methods for dealing with foreclosures, Ms. Pendley said.

At the end of April, about 295,000 households were benefiting from long-term modifications under HAMP, which typically involves cutting the interest rate as low as 2%, according to the Treasury. Another 637,000 households were in trial modifications, under which they need to show they can make their new, lower payments consistently and provide documents proving they are eligible. Under the $50 billion HAMP program, the federal government provides financial incentives to borrowers, loan servicers and mortgage investors for modifying loans.

Andrew Jakabovics, an associate director at the Center for American Progress, a Washington think tank with ties to the Obama administration, said results of HAMP so far were mixed. Borrowers continue to complain that it often takes months, and sometimes more than a year, to get decisions from servicers on whether a loan can be modified on a long-term basis. Mr. Jakabovics said the program would work better if the government dealt directly with applicants for HAMP and decided which ones qualified, rather than delegating that function to servicers.

But Mr. Jakabovics said he didn’t expect major changes in HAMP, which is scheduled to remain in effect through 2012. “For better or worse,” he said, “what we’ve got now is what we’re going to go with.”

Write to James R. Hagerty at bob.hagerty@wsj.com

Want a loan modification? Get your paperwork ready. CNNMoney.com

Are you or someone you know thinking about getting a loan modification? Read this article first!

Another top notch article from NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — Attention delinquent borrowers: If you want to get into the Obama administration’s mortgage modification program, you’d better have your paperwork ready.

New Treasury Department guidelines go into effect on June 1 that will require loan servicers to verify applicants’ income and financial hardship before placing them into trial modifications.
This will make it much tougher to get temporary relief from unaffordable mortgage payments. But if you make it into a trial modification, you’re more likely to get long-term assistance, providing you send in your check on time.

“This will allow people to have more certainty that the modification they want will materialize,” said Suzanne Boas, president of CredAbility, formerly the Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Greater Atlanta.

Of the 1.2 million people who’ve started trial modifications, fewer than 300,000 have received permanent assistance. Another 278,000 have washed out of the program either because they didn’t send in timely payments, hand in the required documents or meet the eligibility criteria.

Paperwork has caused all sorts of problems for the president’s signature foreclosure rescue program. In order to get the effort off the ground quickly, administration officials allowed servicers to place people in trial modifications before verifying that they were indeed eligible for the program.

Originally intended to last three months, the trial period was meant to give troubled borrowers a chance to prove they could make the modified payments and qualify for a so-called permanent modification, which lasts five years.

Instead, many homeowners have been stuck in trial modifications for months and months while they wrestle with servicers over the documentation requirements. The financial institutions say that borrowers aren’t sending in the needed forms; homeowners contend the servicers are losing them.

At Saxon Mortgage Services and JPMorgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500), for instance, about three of four borrowers in the trial phase have lingered there for at least six months.

A few servicers, however, have been requiring documentation up front all along. And the impact of this practice is evident in the government’s monthly modification report. Firms such as Ocwen Financial (OCN) and HomeEq Servicing have converted 83% of eligible borrowers to permanent modifications. Others that rely on stated income to place people in trials have yet to shift half their participants to long-term adjustments.

Many loans didn’t require much documentation when they were originated, which makes gathering the paperwork during the modification process that much more difficult, said Paul Koches, executive vice president at Ocwen. But doing so helps servicers craft sustainable payment plans.

“It puts us in a better position to determine the specific terms and conditions of the modified loans that will make it more likely that they will stick,” he said.

The pace of people entering trial modifications has already slowed as servicers have started requiring the paperwork in advance. Only 47,160 trials were started in April, down from more than 72,000 in February.

“You have pinging back and forth between borrowers and servicers,” said David Sisko, who heads Deloitte & Touche’s default management practice. “Requiring upfront documentation to really start the clock is a good thing.”

Though the application process takes longer, borrowers understand that they will now have a better ideas of whether they’ll get long-term assistance, said a Chase spokesperson.

Among the documents Chase and other servicers require are hardship affidavits, two recent pay stubs, a bank statement, a tax return, proof of occupancy and a 4506T-EZ form.

“If they make the trial payments, it’s almost certain they’ll get a permanent modification because all the paperwork has been done upfront,” she said.

Luxury Sales Bounce Back…

san fran house

An interesting article to say the least… I still believe that this market has some corrections left to address. Your thoughts?

By JULIET CHUNG and JAMES R. HAGERTY at the WSJ

For years, Jennifer Metz and her husband John yearned for a bigger home in San Francisco. Three months ago, the couple started looking, figuring that in this shaky economy, their $3 million budget should provide them a pick of attractive homes and accommodating sellers.
Luxury Going Fast

massachechets house

Kimberly Hallen/Boston Virtual Imaging – A Cambridge, Massachusetts home

They were wrong. Hours after seeing a 5,000-square-foot fixer-upper in Presidio Heights with an asking price around $2.7 million, the Metzes put in a bid—and lost. Soon after, they made another offer on a four-bedroom in Russian Hill. Their bid was rejected.

Last week, the Metzes rushed over to a large, dilapidated home in Pacific Heights that needed a lot of work but was asking the (relatively) low price of $2.25 million. The Metzes put in their over-ask bid the next day, but lost that one too: There were nine offers; the winning bid was $2.56 million.

“It’s frustrating,” says Ms. Metz, a 44-year-old stay-at-home mom whose husband works in finance. “You think you put in a good offer but, no.”

After a near-disastrous 2009, the luxury market appears to be making a comeback, driven by growing buyer confidence, improved financing conditions and more-realistic seller pricing. Despite the housing downturn, attractively priced homes in some of the nation’s most coveted neighborhoods are selling, sometimes fast and sometimes with multiple offers. Nationwide, sales of homes selling for $2 million to $5 million in the first quarter totaled 2,461, up 32% from a year before, says CoreLogic.

san fran house
Sotheby’s

$2,146-per-square-foot is what a buyer paid for this elaborately redone San Francisco home that has a vanishing wall.

That sales are up from last year shouldn’t come as a big surprise. The shock of the financial panic in the fall of 2008 left many potential buyers too nervous to bid, and those who were willing to wade in found it hard to get financing. But a study for The Wall Street Journal by MDA DataQuick, a real-estate data provider, found that in some areas of the country, sales of homes over $2 million in the first quarter were actually on par with the levels of 2005, the peak year for existing-home sales volume nationwide.

In San Francisco, 49 homes sold for $2 million or more in this year’s first quarter, according to the study, compared to 47 in 2005. In Manhattan, there were 402 sales of $2 million or more in the latest quarter, compared with 311 in the first quarter of 2005, according to the appraisal firm Miller Samuel Inc. Other areas with strong rebounds included New York’s Hamptons, Menlo Park, Calif., and Beverly Hills.

Even a couple of troubled housing markets experienced a strong uptick. In Las Vegas, there were 21 such sales in the first quarter, up from 15 in the first quarter of 2005, according to DataQuick. In Miami, 21 such sales of $2 million or more were recorded in the first quarter, up from 15 last year and close to the 23 that sold in that time five years earlier.

Of course, many markets including Greenwich, Conn. and parts of New Jersey are still ailing. Brokers say pricey homes in outlying suburbs are more likely to sit than sell. Miami-Dade County still has enough homes priced at $2 million or more to last 41 months at the current sales pace, though down from 116 months a year earlier, says Ron Shuffield, president of EWM Realtors, a large local brokerage.

The rear of the San Francisco home.
san fran rear house

The recent stock market tumble could unravel the turnaround. Unlike the rest of the housing market, which is driven largely by employment trends, housing analysts say high-end buyers are much more sensitive to changes in the stock market, which for the first quarter was helping them feel even wealthier. “If the markets don’t recover soon, it will scare people” and hurt demand for high-end homes, says Kenneth Rosen, chairman of the Fisher Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics at the University of California, Berkeley.

In the meantime, some high-end renovators are making quick sales. Koby Kempel bought a colonial in Brookline, a posh suburb of Boston, last year for $1.45 million. He raised the ceilings, rebuilt the interior, expanded the home by about 50% and added a heated garage. The six-bedroom home was listed by Mona Wiener of Hammond Residential on a Friday in early May and was under contract the next day for the asking price of nearly $3.5 million.

Back in San Francisco’s Pacific Heights neighborhood, a four-bedroom home on Broadway, with a spa and views of the Golden Gate Bridge, was renovated by Gregory Malin. It went on the market in late January and sold two weeks later for $13.5 million, compared with the $14 million asking price. The listing agent, Val Steele of Sotheby’s International Realty, says the sale, at $2,146 per square foot, marked the first time a home in San Francisco topped $2,000 a square foot since early September 2008.

sandp chart