Fannie Mae gets tough on homeowners who walk away

A great article released last week – written by By E. Scott Reckard, Los Angeles Times addressing strategic default and what the lenders are going to move forward with.

The mortgage giant plans to go to court against those who can afford to make their payments but decide it’s not worth it. It also will limit their access to future loans. – Fannie Mae plans to go after them in court and to limit their access to home loans for seven years.

The government-controlled mortgage giant said Wednesday that it would instruct the companies servicing its loans to recommend when it should pursue a so-called deficiency judgment — a court order requiring a defaulting borrower to pay any remaining unpaid portion of the loan after a seized home is sold.

Lenders rarely employ court proceedings to pursue foreclosures in California, nearly always opting instead for a streamlined procedure involving a trustee’s sale of the home. Under state law, however, lenders who opt for court proceedings can obtain a deficiency judgment if the mortgage was used to refinance a home, but not if it was used to finance a purchase.

Get a daily snapshot of business, financial and technology news delivered to your inbox with our Business Daily newsletter. Sign up »

“It’s not a hollow threat,” said Alex Creel, chief Sacramento lobbyist for the California Assn. of Realtors, which has called for legislation that would ban deficiency judgments in many cases of refinanced mortgages.

Fannie Mae also said it would make new mortgages harder to obtain for borrowers if it can be proved that they engaged in a “strategic default” — abandoning a home to foreclosure not because the required payments are unaffordable but because the mortgage is larger than the value of the residence. For such a borrower, Fannie said it would not buy or guarantee another home loan for seven years.

Borrowers who worked in good faith with their loan servicers to try to stay in their homes would be barred from Fannie loans for only two or three years, even if they eventually lost their homes after attempts at loan modifications failed.

The ban on getting a new Fannie loan is significant because home buyers have little choice these days for financing except for mortgages bought or backed by Fannie, its sister company Freddie Mac or the Federal Housing Administration. The three government-run entities financed 95% of new U.S. home loans last year.

Freddie Mac, which already blacklists strategic defaulters for five years, said it would study Fannie’s changes and “consider additional changes to our polices as needed to responsibly manage risks.”

Borrowers who default on FHA loans for any reason currently can’t get another loan insured by the agency for three years. Legislation pending in Congress would impose a lifetime ban on FHA loans to borrowers determined to have made a strategic default.

Fannie Mae’s get-tough policy on so-called walkaways is the latest fallout from the housing meltdown, which has eroded the once widely held belief in homeownership as the path to household wealth.

Foreclosures continue at a rate of 2.5 million a year, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chairwoman Sheila Bair said, and some 11 million households owe more on their mortgage than their home is worth.

Fannie Mae’s new policies are designed to prod borrowers into pursuing alternatives to foreclosure, including short sales — transactions in which lenders allow a home to be sold and cancel the debt while accepting less than full payoff of the mortgage.

Borrowers who are slightly underwater — owing just a little more than their homes are worth — are unlikely to stop paying their mortgages if they have the resources, according to studies by research firm CoreLogic. But if the home’s value is at least 25% less than the loan amount, borrowers are far more likely then to walk away.

In the fourth quarter of 2008, strategic defaulters accounted for 18% of all borrowers who were 60 days past due on their loans, according a study by credit-data giant Experian and consulting firm Oliver Wyman.

Last March, 31% of foreclosures were described as strategic by the borrowers themselves, compared with 22% in March 2009, researchers at the University of Chicago and Northwestern University reported.

scott.reckard@latimes.com

Copyright © 2010, The Los Angeles Times

Home prices up 3.8% in April – but don’t celebrate

By Les Christie, staff writerJune 29, 2010: 10:03 AM ET

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — Home prices rose 0.8% in April compared with March and were up 3.8% from a year ago, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index of 20 major housing markets.

That good news is tempered by a couple of factors. First, the one-year comparison was against a low-ebb mark. In April 2009, prices were just above a five-year low. Overall, prices are off 30% from their peak

Secondly, the improvement came during a time when the federal government was heavily subsidizing home sales through an $8,000 homebuyer’s tax credit. That credit is about to expire.

“Other housing data confirm the large impact, and likely near-future pullback, of the federal program,” said David Blitzer, a spokesman for Standard and Poor’s.

Once the tax credit fully expires, home prices are likely to take a beating, according to Pat Newport, a housing market analyst for IHS Global Insight.

“The housing glut and foreclosures will drive the national Case-Shiller index down another 6% to 8%, with prices bottoming in 2011,” he said.

The strongest rebound has been in California, where S&P tracks three major markets. San Francisco prices jumped 2.2% month-over-month and are up 18% year-over-year, more than any other city in the 20-city index.

San Diego prices rose 0.7% compared with March and 11.7% since April 2009. Los Angeles prices rose 7.8% over the past 12 months, and 0.7% in April.

The biggest loser over the past 12 months has been Las Vegas, down 8.5%. Prices rose there 0.3% there month-over-month.

Only two cities saw values fall during the month. Miami prices fell 0.8% for the month, which pushed the city into negative territory for the year at -0.5%. New York dropped 0.3% month-over-month and is off 1% year-over-year.

VA Loans Getting Harder To Get!

Va Loans

This is truly frustrating in my opinion… VA Buyers are finally back in the game and it’s becoming harder for them to get financing.

Va Loans

MILITARY veterans have long been accustomed to a relatively easy mortgage process. Even borrowers with no down payment or a low credit score were usually granted V.A. loans, in large part because the Department of Veterans Affairs insures a quarter of the loan amount.

But about two years ago, lenders began limiting the conditions under which they would offer these mortgages, and industry executives say that since the start of the year, all the nation’s major lenders have followed suit.

“It’s been a tightening across the board,” said Nathan Long, the chief executive of VAMortgageCenter.com, an online broker of V.A. mortgages.

Lenders will still offer V.A. loans with no down payment, he said, but “if you have a credit score of 610, the best thing to do is work on your credit and try again in a couple of months, because you don’t really have any options.”

Mr. Long says major lenders like Bank of America, Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase, typically will not offer V.A. loans to borrowers with credit scores below 610. Debora Blume, a spokeswoman for Wells Fargo, said the cutoff score for her bank’s V.A.-insured loans was 600.

The tighter credit policies also extend to the Streamline Refinance program, which allows borrowers with V.A. loans to refinance into another V.A. loan with very little paperwork and, until recently, no appraisal.

Mr. Long and V.A. representatives say that lenders are now requiring borrowers to pay for an appraisal, which can cost $300 or more depending on a home’s location. If the new loan amount is more than the value of the home, they will most likely reject the application.

Not surprisingly, V.A. loan volume has fallen so far this year. William White, the acting assistant director for loan policy at Veterans Affairs, said his agency was on pace to insure about 300,000 mortgages this fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30, versus 325,000 in 2009. The nation’s overall loan volume rose about 19 percent during the same period, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association, to $1.92 trillion from $1.62 trillion. (The trade group tracks only total dollar amount.)

Mr. White said he understood why lenders might be restricting the loans, as the V.A. insurance only covers 25 percent of the loan amount. But he added that borrowers of V.A. loans generally had a lower default rate than prime borrowers over all — 2.6 percent versus 3.4 percent, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association — despite the fact that their credit scores were typically lower.

V.A. mortgage borrowers tend to “show some discipline,” Mr. White said, offering one explanation, “and we think they try real hard to make their payments.”

The average credit score for a V.A. borrower last year was just over 700, while the average credit score for all borrowers was 750, according to the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that establish underwriting standards.

Mr. Long noted that V.A. loans remain competitive with other loan products. Borrowers who qualify — they must prove 24 months of continuous active military duty, and cannot have experienced a dishonorable discharge, among other things — can secure rates of 4.75 percent on 30-year fixed-rate loans, he said. That is the case even for borrowers with 620 credit scores, he added. The average rate nationwide for all 30-year fixed-rate loans is around 4.70 percent.

There is a one-time insurance fee that varies according to the size of the loan and the borrower’s credit profile, but the average is about 1.75 percent of the loan amount. On a $200,000 mortgage the cost would be $3,500. About a quarter of applicants — disabled or retired veterans, for instance — qualify for exemptions from that payment.
A version of this article appeared in print on June 27, 2010, on page RE7 of the New York edition.

Deeds-in-lieu gain favor with lenders as alternative to foreclosure

Very well written and clear interpretation of what to expect with a deed in lieu – Let’s see how many homeowners this will help.

Short sales have been the hot solution for financially stressed homeowners and their lenders for the last year, but here’s another potent foreclosure alternative that’s about to take center stage: deeds-in-lieu.

Some of the largest mortgage servicers and lenders in the country are gearing up campaigns to reach out to borrowers who owe more on their mortgages than their homes are worth with cash incentives that sometimes range into five figures, plus a simple message: Let’s bypass all the time-consuming hassles of short sales and foreclosures. Just deed us the title to your underwater home and we’ll call it a deal. We won’t come after you to collect any deficiency between what you owe us on the mortgage and what we obtain from the home sale. We might even be able to wrap up the whole transaction in as little as 30 to 45 days. How about it?

Mortgage companies say troubled borrowers increasingly are signing up. One of the largest servicers, Bank of America, has mailed out 100,000 deed-in-lieu solicitations to customers in the last 60 days, and its volume of completed transactions is breaking company records, according to officials.

What precisely are deeds-in-lieu? The full name is deeds-in-lieu-of-foreclosure. They are voluntary transfers of property ownership from borrowers to creditors that make court-directed foreclosures unnecessary.

The concept is one of the oldest in real estate, but it got a boost this year when the Obama administration included it as an option in its Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives program, and mortgage giant Fannie Mae cut the penalty-box time for homeowners who use the technique from four years to two before they can qualify for another home mortgage.

Deeds-in-lieu also are surging because they provide a win-win for borrowers and mortgage investors that short sales often cannot match. Tops on the list: speed. Travis Hamel Olsen, chief operating officer of Loan Resolution Corp., a Scottsdale, Ariz., firm that works with lenders to solve troubled borrowers’ problems, said deeds-in-lieu represented “a very expeditious way to move on” for underwater borrowers who are facing potential foreclosure.

“A lot of owners just want to be finished with it, now,” he said. “They don’t want to deal with [the house] anymore.”

They don’t want to deal with real estate agents or signs on the front lawn that reveal their financial squeeze to neighbors. They don’t want to haggle with potential buyers coming in with low-ball prices. But they also don’t want to simply walk away because that will affect their credit files and scores for as long as seven years.

A key motivation for lenders is that they are stuck with massive backlogs of underwater homes that haven’t yet gone through foreclosure and been put on the market — the so-called shadow inventory, said Greg Hebner, president of MOS Group Inc. of San Diego, which works with banks and investors across the country to resolve defaulting borrowers’ situations.

Not only is it cheaper for lenders to do deeds-in-lieu to gain control of those properties, but with current mortgage rates below 5%, they’re likely to be able to resell the properties faster and on potentially more favorable terms in the summer and fall.

“If you can get a lot of inventory moving in the next couple of months” of prime home-buying season, Hebner said, “you are solving a lot of problems.”

Matt Vernon, Bank of America’s top short sale and deed-in-lieu executive, said the technique worked so well for both borrowers and mortgage owners that his company was running pilot programs in major housing markets to alert borrowers who might benefit but are not familiar with deeds-in-lieu.

To sweeten the pot, Bank of America is offering cash incentives that range from $3,000 to $15,000 — and is getting a strong response, Vernon said.

What are the downsides or limitations of deeds-in-lieu for homeowners? Probably the most important, experts said, is that they don’t work for every situation involving serious mortgage default. For example, if you have equity in the property, you’ll probably want to pursue a loan modification first, rather than hand over your equity stake to the lender.

Deeds-in-lieu usually don’t work when there are multiple mortgages from different creditors encumbering the property. Also, though deeds-in-lieu do less damage to borrowers’ credit histories than foreclosures or bankruptcies, they definitely leave a mark. Fair Isaac, developer of the widely used FICO credit score, says on its MyFico website that deeds-in-lieu and short sales are both treated as “not paid as agreed” accounts, and are treated the same by the FICO scoring model.

kenharney@earthlink.net – Distributed by Washington Post Writers Group.
By Kenneth R. Harney – LA Times Business…

Homebuyer credit extension heads to Obama

An excellent article to clarify the existing tax credit; however please watch the video from CNN Money with Meridith Whitney commenting on the state of affiars of our current real estate market… very well done!

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — First-time homebuyers will have until Sept. 30 to close on their purchases and land an $8,000 tax credit under a bill passed by the Senate late Wednesday.

President Obama is expected to sign the bill, which was overwhelmingly approved by the House on Tuesday. The deadline had been June 30.

The bill doesn’t help anyone currently shopping for a home. Buyers must have signed a contract by April 30 to qualify for the tax break. At issue is when the deal must be finalized.

Qualified existing homeowners also have until Sept. 30 to close on new homes and receive a tax credit of up to $6,500.

Congress has been trying to pass the extension for the last month, but it got caught up in Washington politics. Only when it was separated from a larger jobs bill did deficit-wary lawmakers sign off on it. The extension will lower the deficit by $9 million over a decade since it is offset by certain other provisions.

An estimated 200,000 people have missed out on the tax credit because they wouldn’t have been able to close by the end of business Wednesday. Many are trying to take advantage of short sales, which are complicated deals to complete.

The Senate approved the stand-alone homebuyers tax credit shortly after a failed attempt to advance a bill that combined the credit with an unemployment benefits extension.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said the chamber will take up the benefits bill again once a replacement for the late Senator Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., is named. – By Tami Luhby, senior writerJuly 1, 2010: 10:54 AM ET