California home sales hit 7-month high in December

os Angeles Business from bizjournals – by Elizabeth Kim , the Silicon Valley/San Jose Business Journal
Date: Friday, January 21, 2011, 12:00pm PST

California home sales rose in December to their highest level since May, according to a report Friday from the California Association of Realtors, as the inventory of unsold homes dwindled.

December’s sales were up 5.9 percent from November’s revised figure of 491,590 but were down 6.8 percent from the revised 558,840 of December 2009.

The unsold inventory index for existing, single-family detached homes was 5 months in December, down from 6.2 months in November but up from 3.8 months in December 2009. The index indicates the number of months needed to deplete the supply of homes on the market at the current sales rate.

Read more: California home sales hit 7-month high in December | Los Angeles Business from bizjournals – Full Story – Click Here…

Home seizures by banks decline in state

Trash litters the front yard of a bank-owned home in Phoenix. Arizona was among the states hardest hit by the housing meltdown. (Joshua Lott, Reuters / January 13, 2011)

Los Angeles Times

While foreclosures climbed 2% nationally, California saw a 14% drop. But California’s high unemployment rate and resetting loans mean the fall in foreclosure activity could be brief.

Fewer Californians grappled with foreclosure last year, bucking a national trend and giving homeowners fresh hope that the state’s housing market could be on the mend.

Trash litters the front yard of a bank-owned home in Phoenix. Arizona was among the states hardest hit by the housing meltdown. (Joshua Lott, Reuters / January 13, 2011)

Fewer Californians grappled with foreclosure last year, bucking a national trend and giving homeowners fresh hope that the state’s housing market could be on the mend.

The 14% drop in foreclosure activity contrasted with a 2% rise nationally, according to data tracking firm RealtyTrac. Analysts noted that California’s housing market was among the first to falter and may now be among the first to recover. Home prices here hit bottom in April 2009, and have gradually risen since then.

Read the full story

If you follow my blog at all… I have a few questions for you. How can anyone know what media forum is correct? Did you see my post yesterday about 1 million homes foreclosed in 2011? While this article is more geographically specific, I would question how accurate is this data, and is it really an issue or a concern to me?

Rather than have uncertainty in the future market, ask yourself, how long am I going to live in my next home? How comfortable am I with my current job, with my current mortgage or rent payment? We have no control over the market; however we as consumers have full control over our individual plans, thoughts and actions.

Real Estate: Finally a Good Investment?

As posted by: Smart Money

Real Estate: Finally a good investment?
The housing market still looks pretty bleak: There were a record 1 million foreclosures last year, home prices are still falling in many regions, and the number of “underwater” properties is at a record high.

And things don’t look much better in other areas of real estate. The number of construction jobs continues to decline, even as other parts of the economy have added jobs. And mortgage rates have moved higher as long-term Treasury yields have backed up during the past few months.

Basically, the real estate market remains a mess.

Real estate encompasses a wide range of markets – homes, apartments, hospitals, office buildings, strip malls, dormitories and other properties. But for our purposes, let’s focus on residential real estate, or homes. Here are four reasons to think residential real estate might represent a bargain – with one big caveat.

MAKING SENSE OF THE STORY FOR CONSUMERS

• Everyone hates homes – When the housing market is in the doldrums, people tend to avoid thinking about the value of their home. Sellers complain they’re not getting offers and buyers bemoan the strict lending requirements. However, prospective buyers should be contrarian and take advantage of a down housing market.

• Smart people are buying real estate – A prominent hedge-fund manager said in a speech last fall: “If you don’t own a home, buy one. If you own a home, buy another one, and if you own two homes, buy a third and lend your relatives the money to buy a home.” He believes that interest rates and home prices will rise this year, so real estate bargains won’t last much longer.

• Real estate performs well during inflation – Convention says Treasury Inflation Protected Securities, commodities, and real estate do well in an inflationary environment. Real estate performed well during the period in the 1970s, when persistent inflation and high unemployment occurred.

• Demand may be coming back – Job creation and getting people employed are the two major factors in the housing rebound. There’s much debate about when the job market will recovery. Optimists say the recovery will happen this year, while pessimists say it won’t happen for several years.

Read the full story… click here.

Bull vs. Bear: Will housing rebound?

bull vs bear

An interesting read to say the least… let me know your thoughts!
As seen in CNN Money – Posted by Nin-Hai Tseng, writer-reporter- December 27, 2010

It’s a question many Americans want answered: Will the value of my home rise or fall next year? Smart minds fall in both camps — here are both sides of the coin on real estate.

One of the most closely watched sectors in 2011 will continue to be real estate – a wildly emotional and divisive topic that’s puzzled investors and economists since the housing bubble burst around 2007. Earlier this year, many observers thought the market would turn around in a big way as federal tax credits spurred home purchases and the economy added jobs following hundreds of billions of dollars of government stimulus spending.

As the end of the year approaches, the prospects of a real recovery look much dimmer. For one, it’s become clear that we won’t see a true rebound until we have job growth. With unemployment showing few signs of improvement so far, the bullish take on housing seems hard to swallow, especially when many experts say home prices still have room to fall before hitting bottom.

But a bullish take doesn’t necessarily mean that prices would significantly rise. These are unprecedented times, and even the more cheery views fall short of predicting a steady surge in home values.

Here’s a bullish and bearish look at real estate for 2011.

Bull: Buy real estate!

One of the most vocal bulls on housing for 2011 has been Bill Ackman, founder and CEO of hedge fund Pershing Square Capital Management. At the Value Investing Congress in November, Ackman made a bold presentation called “How To Make A Fortune,” highlighting why it’s the right time to invest in real estate.

Ackman laid out several reasons but some key points include: With the fall in home prices and mortgage rates still relatively low, affordability is at its highest level in decades. What’s more, while there’s clearly still a glut in the supply of unoccupied homes, it will start to decline given that the rate of home construction is at historic lows.

Some of Ackman’s points sound similar to the reasons billionaire investor Warren Buffett gave earlier this year for his prediction that the real estate slump would end by about 2011.

Of course, this doesn’t mean he thinks home prices will return to their 2007 peak. In Buffett’s annual letter to shareholders of his Berkshire Hathaway (BRKA), which owns real-estate brokerage and manufacturer Clayton Homes, he predicted that demand for homes would catch up with supply following a period where the glut of unsold property caused home construction to dramatically fall.

In 2009, housing starts (the supply side) were 554,000 – by far the lowest number in the 50 years for which Berkshire could date. “Paradoxically, this is good news,” Buffett wrote.

And with home prices falling, he said families who couldn’t afford to buy a few years ago would finally be able to afford to do so. Buffett put it this way: “Prices will remain far below ‘bubble’ levels, of course, but for every seller (or lender) hurt by this there will be a buyer who benefits.”

It’s anyone’s guess if Buffett’s position on housing will change much in his letter to shareholders next year. It also remains to be seen if Ackman will continue to trump his “How to Make a Fortune” pitch with the recent rise in mortgage rates. For now, at least, both investors see promise in housing.

Bear: What bottom?

While home prices have for the most part stopped their freefall, some economists believe they haven’t hit bottom yet.

Rick Sharga, a senior vice president at RealtyTrac, an online marketplace for foreclosure properties, recently told The Wall Street Journal that foreclosures for 2011 could top the estimated 1.2 million bank repossessions this year, which reflected an increase of 900,000 from 2009. This is partly due to the so-called “robosigning” mess that forced some lenders to stall a flurry of foreclosures.

While Sharga predicts that home prices nationally could still fall by about 5%, others say they could drop much more at about 10%.

Some might argue that further declines coupled with relatively low mortgage rates might just spur a flurry of home purchases, but Daryl Jones, an analysts at investment research firm Hedgeye says that’s unlikely given that credit standards at virtually all major lenders are much higher and typically require larger down payments that would actually add to costs. Jones also thinks that home prices could fall another 15% to 30%, which means homes are actually still overpriced and might not attract more buyers as Ackman argues.

And while home construction is at all-time lows, Hedgeye says the trend is probably not as promising as Buffett and Ackman might think. The supply of housing is still very high – the firm estimated in November that there’s still 11 months of supply on the market to absorb, which is close to levels seen in 2009.

With so many variables working against the housing market, the bearish takes becomes all the more convincing. But one can always hope they’re wrong.

Some condo owners may lose FHA financing

By Kenneth R. Harney – December 12, 2010
Reporting from Washington

Their ability to sell or refinance their units could be hampered if their condo projects missed a key deadline for recertification. Tens of thousands of condominium unit owners around the country may not know it, but their ability to sell or refinance could be jeopardized by a rolling series of federal government deadlines.

On Wednesday, an estimated 2,200 condominium projects missed an eligibility deadline involving sales or refinancings using Federal Housing Administration-insured mortgages. The deadline was originally set by FHA for recertification or approval of these projects, but at the last minute the agency agreed to extend eligibility for most of them — 23,000 projects — into next year, with a series of rolling expiration dates. A group of 2,200 condo projects around the country received extensions only until the end of this month.

What this means, say lenders and condo experts, is that unsuspecting unit owners nationwide could suddenly be cut off from an increasingly important source of mortgage money. In some markets where FHA accounts for 75% or more of first-time home purchases, condo sellers could be severely handicapped. In parts of the country with heavy concentrations of condos, such as California, Florida, New England, Washington, D.C., and the urban Midwest, the effects could even depress sales prices.

“This is a travesty” unfolding, said Jon Eberhardt, president of Condo Approvals LLC, a national consulting firm based in Torrance. “You’ve got thousands of people out there with no idea” that FHA financing could evaporate for them in the near future.

“This is going to be a big problem,” said Steve Stamets, a loan officer with Union Mortgage Group in Rockville, Md., with numerous condo clients. “I expect you will have frantic sellers pushing management companies” to get their condo buildings approved.

The eligibility issue dates to November 2009, when the FHA published new rules on the types of condo projects acceptable for mortgages on unit sales and refinancings. The rules were the outgrowth of a review that found the FHA — essentially a government-owned insurance company — had approved thousands of projects over the previous two decades but possessed inadequate current information on their underlying homeowners associations’ budgets, legal documents, insurance coverage, renter-to-owner ratios, delinquencies on condo fee payments, the amount of commercial space and a variety of other characteristics that could affect a project’s financial stability.

The 2009 guidance spelled out toughened standards in these areas and set up timetables for taking fresh looks at projects before sanctioning additional unit financings. Condo projects that had been approved by the FHA before October 2008, the guidance said, would have to submit the information required for renewed approval by Dec. 7, 2010, or lose eligibility for FHA financing.

FHA officials issued bulletins and notices during the last year to lenders, condo management companies and consulting firms warning them about the approaching deadline. Ultimately, however, according to FHA officials, roughly 25,000 projects nationwide missed the cutoff. Officials said they had no estimate on the number of individual units affected, but clearly it’s a sizable multiple of 25,000. For example, Eberhardt said, the average condo project in California contains 85 units.

Rather than abruptly eliminate financing for such a large and important segment of the country’s housing market, FHA relented and announced the revised schedule of expirations.

Though the precise expiration schedules were not immediately available, FHA officials said they planned to notify condo associations, management companies and lenders on the specifics shortly.

What can owners do? Tops on the list, according to FHA officials, is to get in touch with the leaders of your homeowners association. Ask them to do what’s necessary to get the project through the approval hoops. Large mortgage lenders can also get the ball rolling if they want to finance a unit in the project.

Costs for a recertification or approval can run from just under $1,000 to more than $3,000. Time for approvals may be a much more significant factor, however. Eberhardt says his firm can assemble documents and create a package for the FHA in about five days, but the process can extend for an additional 45 days to more than 60 days if the FHA staff is overwhelmed with applications. That just might happen in the coming weeks as unit owners begin learning about their financing cutoff deadlines.

Meanwhile, your sale or refinancing could be put on hold.

kenharney@earthlink.net
Distributed by Washington Post Writers Group.- Copyright © 2010, Los Angeles Times

Your credit score is constantly changing

A great article that address quite a few relevant questions.

It also varies depending on which of the three main credit repositories you check. Each has a different scoring formula and different information in its files. – By Lew Sichelman – October 24, 2010 – Reporting from Washington —

Here is a scenario that happens all too frequently: A would-be home buyer applies online to obtain his all-important credit score. It comes back at a healthy 720, good enough to qualify for the best rate in the mortgage market. But then, when he applies for a loan with a local lender, his score is much lower. So low, in fact, that he might not qualify, even at less favorable terms.

What gives? How can your credit score be one number on one day and a different figure the next? And why does your score vary from one company to another?

A lot of things could be at play here. Let’s start with the basics.
A credit score is a three-digit number that is considered an accurate predictor of whether you will make your house payments on time every month. The higher the number, the safer the bet that you will repay.

But your score is based on the information contained in your credit record. And because what’s in your file is fluid, so is your score.

“Credit is dynamic information,” says Greg Holmes, national director of sales and marketing at Credit Plus, a Salisbury, Md., company that serves the mortgage business. “It’s constantly changing. It’s up and down and constantly moving.”

Your record changes every time the company that has your car loan reports an on-time payment — or more important, a missed payment that’s now more than 30 days late. It changes each time your credit card balance changes. It changes every time you apply for new credit. And it changes when an old bankruptcy finally falls into the abyss, never to be reported again.

Because a credit record is a moving target, shifting on a daily or even hourly basis, your credit score is nothing more than a numerical snapshot of your file at the moment it is calculated. As such it can change from one moment to the next.

“It depends on how much information is coming and going in and out of that credit report,” Holmes says. “It’s whatever time of day and month you pull the report. There’s even a difference between an account that’s less than six months old and one that’s older.”

If you asked someone to pull your credit score today, exactly six months and 29 days after you closed a department store account, for example, the number would be different than if you asked tomorrow, when it has been seven months since the account was shut down. Maybe not by much, but perhaps enough to alter your chances to obtain financing.

But there’s more to your score than what’s in it. Another big factor is what’s not in it. Not every creditor reports information to each of the three main credit repositories.

Say your auto lender is a local bank that reports only to Experian because Experian has a bigger presence in your state. In that case, neither TransUnion nor Equifax will know whether you are current on your car payments. They wouldn’t know about your car loan at all. As a result, a credit score based on your Experian file will be different from one based on the records maintained by the other two big bureaus.

Also, each repository has its own credit-scoring formula. A Minneapolis analytics company known as FICO (formerly Fair, Isaac and Co.), from which the term “FICO score” comes, created all the formulas. But the algorithm used by each credit bureau is slightly different based on factors that each believes to be a more or less important component of risk.

So not only is TransUnion’s score different from Equifax’s and Experian’s because it is based on information only in its records; it’s also different because it uses a different analytical model. And even if each depository maintained the same files, their scores would be different because they use different formulas.

Next, it’s important to know that the mortgage industry isn’t the only business to use credit scoring to rate potential borrowers. Actually, housing finance came somewhat late to the technique. The insurance business has been grading potential customers for decades, and now auto lenders, finance companies, banks, employers and dozens of others use credit scoring to make decisions.

The key is that each business has its own scoring formula. And a score that may be acceptable to, say, the finance company offering to lend you $5,000 for a new roof probably won’t be acceptable to a mortgage company trying to decide whether to lend you $500,000 to buy a new house.

So if you received your score from one of the Internet sites that provide a free score — but try to hook you into paying a monthly fee to monitor your credit file — it’s a safe bet that the number, accurate or not, won’t be worth much if you are in the market to buy a house.

If you’re buying a house, you’ll want an industry-specific mortgage score. No other score will do.

“Anybody can calculate a score,” Holmes says. “Who accepts it is what really matters. Even the scores used in the mortgage industry wouldn’t mean anything if Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac didn’t accept them. Or if JPMorgan Chase or Wells Fargo or Bank of America didn’t accept them.”

You can obtain a free copy of your credit record from each of the three major credit bureaus at http://www.annualcreditreport.com. The law entitles you to one free report every 12 months from each repository, but there’s nowhere I know of to obtain a free credit score.

Many outfits offer “free” credit scores, but in most cases, you have to sign up — for a monthly fee — for a credit-monitoring service. You usually can opt out of the service after a trial period. But the companies are hoping that you won’t, or that you’ll forget and won’t pay much attention to your credit card bill when it arrives in the mail.

But remember, not every score is acceptable to mortgage lenders. I’m aware of only one online service that fits the bill: http://www.myfico.com. But even then, you’ll have to sign up for the Score Watch monitoring service that FICO offers in conjunction with Equifax. You’ll just have to remember to cancel the service before the free trial period runs out.

Beyond that, would-be home buyers can obtain meaningful credit scores by applying for a mortgage, either directly with a lender or with a broker who deals with several lenders. Once you apply, lenders are obligated by law to share the score they used as a basis to decide whether you qualify.

And once you obtain a satisfactory credit score, make sure that you don’t do anything credit-wise that will change it, at least not until after the loan closes. Remember, a credit score is a moving target, so if you run out and buy new furniture using credit, your score will suffer, and you may no longer qualify for a mortgage to buy your house.

lsichelman@aol.com – Distributed by United Feature Syndicate. Copyright © 2010, Los Angeles Times

Hope you find this article helpful… have a great day and thank you for checking back in.

Banks seize 288K homes in Q3, but challenges await!

In this March 24, 2009 file photo, a sign lies on the ground in front of a foreclosed home in Homestead, Fla. Officials in 49 states have launched a joint investigation into allegations that mortgage companies mishandled documents and broke laws in foreclosing on hundreds of thousands of homeowners.

By ALEX VEIGA, AP Real Estate Writer
Thursday, October 14, 2010 – J Pat Carter / AP

In this March 24, 2009 file photo, a sign lies on the ground in front of a foreclosed home in Homestead, Fla. Officials in 49 states have launched a joint investigation into allegations that mortgage companies mishandled documents and broke laws in foreclosing on hundreds of thousands of homeowners.

Lenders seized more U.S. homes this summer than in any three-month stretch since the housing market began to bust in 2006. But many of the foreclosures may be challenged in court later because of allegations that banks evicted people without reading the documents.

A total of 288,345 properties were lost to foreclosure in the July-September quarter, according to data released Thursday by RealtyTrac Inc., a foreclosure listing service. That’s up from nearly 270,000 in the second quarter, the previous high point in the firm’s records dating back to 2005.

Banks have seized more than 816,000 homes through the first nine months of the year and had been on pace to seize 1.2 million by the end of 2010. But fewer are expected now that several major lenders have suspended foreclosures and sales of repossessed homes until they can sort out the foreclosure-documents mess.

On Wednesday, officials in 50 states and the District of Columbia launched a joint investigation into the matter.

Rick Sharga, a senior vice president at RealtyTrac, noted that legal challenges are likely. But he doubts many will be successful in overturning foreclosures. He said he expects foreclosures to resume and predicts about 1 million homes will be taken back this year.

“The bottom line is not that those properties won’t be repossessed,” Sharga said. “They simply won’t be repossessed as quickly. We’re simply delaying the inevitable.”

Experts say if lenders resume foreclosures in a couple of months or so, the delay will amount to a temporary lull followed by a spike in home repossessions early next year.

But if the crisis drags on for months and more lenders stop seizing homes, the foreclosure delays could last well into next year. That could have a severe effect on home sales and prices.

A freeze in foreclosure sales between now and December by a majority of lenders could amount to removing 30 percent of all home sales for that period, Sharga suggests.

“You would virtually guarantee that tens of thousands of properties would miss going to market in time for the spring, which is the peak buying season for real estate,” Sharga said.

Nearly 600,000 bank-owned homes are not yet on the market, according to RealtyTrac.

The states most affected by the foreclosure freeze accounted for 40 percent of all foreclosure activity in the third quarter and 36 percent of homes taken back by lenders, the firm estimates. Sales of homes by lenders made up 18 percent of all U.S. home sales in September, the firm said.

Other experts say delays from the foreclosure documents problem won’t end up having a huge impact on home sales or housing values.

Foreclosed homes that would have been sold by lenders now will be sold seven or eight months from now, and prices will start going declining about 3 percent to 4 percent nationally, on average, when those sales take place, said Andres Carbacho-Burgos, an economist at Moody’s Economy.com.

That’s good news if you’re a homeowner looking to sell in the near term, because there won’t be as much competition from deeply discounted foreclosed properties, Carbacho-Burgos said.

“But if you were looking to sell further down the line, that’s not so good news,” he said.

Economic woes, such as unemployment or reduced income, continue to be the main catalysts for foreclosures this year.

While bank repossessions rose in the third quarter, new defaults continued to decline.

Some 269,647 properties received default notices, the first step in the foreclosure process, down 1 percent from the second quarter and down 21 percent from the same period last year, according to RealtyTrac, which tracks notices for defaults, scheduled home auctions and home repossessions.

In all, 930,437 homeowners received a foreclosure-related warning between July and September, up nearly 4 percent from the second quarter but down 1 percent from the same period last year, RealtyTrac said. The latest tally translates to one in 139 U.S. homes.

AP Real Estate Writer Alan Zibel contributed from Washington to this report.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/10/13/financial/f210144D21.DTL#ixzz12khYnT1L

Incredible Single Story with Amazing Improvements…

CIMG2878


span id=”ctl00_C_lblPropertyDescription”>Incredible home nestled in the heart of Anaheim Hills in the highly sought after community of “Shadow Run”. This Warmington home offers a generous free-flowing floor-plan which is nicely appointed with upgrades throughout. Some of the spectacular improvements include newer exterior paint and dual pane windows, an updated kitchen with white-washed kitchen cabinets, recessed lighting, coffered ceilings, garden window, modern appliances and custom tile flooring; a great breakfast nook with open beam ceilings and a large bay window.  In addition to a formal living room with open beam ceiling, plantation shutters and neutral paint, a stacked stone fireplace and custom French doors enhance the family room.  The master includes updated wood casement windows, his and her vanity, large soaking tub and tile flooring. The grounds are gorgeous as they offer a concrete deck with brick and wrought iron accents, block wall planters, a beautiful custom patio cover and much, much more.  


Price: $599,900

Address:399 S. Silverbrook Lane Anaheim Hills, CA. 92807

Bedrooms: 3

Bedrooms: 2

Square Feet: 1987

View additional information and photos of this property on your phone: text jsimons5 to 444888


div>For additional information, to schedule your private showing please call: 888.878.4909 ext 30


Are you or someone you know thinking about selling your home?  Request a free report, the 10 dumbest things that smart sellers do when selling their home.  Simply click here and fill out the form, your report will be sent out immediately. 

Foreclosure Trends Report from Realty Trac

This is the most recent update available directly from Realty Trac… please feel comfortable giving me a call should you have any questions about the market or if you would like a simply interpretation of the data and what it means to you!

RealtyTrac™ Logo

Nationwide Agent Network

Agent Photo
Jeffrey Simons
181 S. Old Springs Rd.,
Anaheim Hills,
CA
92808
I am available to assist you in purchasing a foreclosure property or another property best suited to your needs. Buying or selling, I am here to act as your local real estate specialist.
Phone: 714-746-8103
Email: jeff@jeffreysimons.com
September 2010
Vol 4 Issue 18
6 month California Foreclosure Trends
NOD
NTS
NFS
LIS
REO

Search for Investment Properties>

California Foreclosure Activity Slows Down in July

Foreclosure activity in California decreased 3 percent in July to 66,910 properties with foreclosure filings, 38 percent below the level reported in July 2009, according to the latest RealtyTrac® U.S. Foreclosure Market Report.

“It is easy to understand why California continues to dominate in total foreclosures even while foreclosure activity as a whole continues to decline on both a monthly and yearly basis when you consider that the state has the largest population and the most housing units in the country,” said James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac.
Complete Story

Cash Flow Crazy: A Real Estate Investor Story

By Daren Blomquist

Minneapolis-area resident Mark Kozikowski sold his business three years ago and started investing in real estate full time. He specializes in buying distressed buildings at a discount so he can renovate them and then rent them out for the long-haul with a nice monthly cash flow. Kozikowski uses RealtyTrac as his primary source for finding the distressed properties he purchases.

“A lot of people think I’m crazy when I tell them what I do, and I actually think I got into this at a good time,” he said. “Because I’m buying more toward the bottom and finding a lot of good deals on distressed properties.”
Complete Story

Here are some of the most recent Investment opportunities in the area.


Pre-Foreclosure
S Larkwood St
Anaheim,
CA 92808
  • Market Value
  • Default Amount
  • $480,342
  • $12,263
  • Beds/Bath
  • Sq. FT
  • 3/1
  • 0

Property Type Address Market Value Default Sq. Ft.  
Bank-Owned
S Glenhurst Dr,
Anaheim, CA 92808
$248,772 N/A 1,061

GET DETAILS
Auction
Auction Date: 11/15/10
E Margaret Ct,
Anaheim, CA 92808
$346,046 N/A 1,546

GET DETAILS
View more properties in Orange County

Is Mortgage Relief In Your Future?

There’s a little voice you might have heard, the one which says it’s great that the government is trying to help people facing foreclosure but what about you and me?

In July the typical borrower helped by the Making Home Affordable program was paying $513 less for their mortgage, a 36 percent decline. That’s good, and yet there’s that little voice. As much as I like my fellow citizens, why can’t the government help you and me save some mortgage money each month?

In fact, such an idea is now on the table.


Complete Story

Foreclosure Trends : June, 2010
National California Orange CTY
NODs 38,033 25,068 1,543
NTSs 93,328 31,045 1,868
NFSs 38,761 0 0
LISs 58,194 0 0
REOs 85,527 13,001 501
Search for Investment Properties
Foreclosure Terms
Notice of Default (NOD)

A non-judicial document filed by a trustee that starts the foreclosure process. More about NOD

Lis Penden (LIS)

Notification of pending lawsuit. A judicial document filed by an attorney or trustee that starts the foreclosure process. More about LIS

Auction / Notice of Trustee’s Sale (NTS)

A filing by notice announcing a public auction. More about NTS

Notice (Judgment) of Foreclosure Sale (NFS)

An order signed by a judge directing to sell the property at public auction. More about NFS

Real Estate Owned (REO)

The final step in foreclosure process in which property ownership returns to lender. More about REOs




30 yr fixed mtg 4.37% 15 yr fixed mtg 3.82% 5/1 ARM 3.54%

Troubled homeowners find help outside Obama program

LA 144853.jpg

Great article explaining the continued challenges with Loan Modifications and our current state of affairs.

More mortgages were permanently modified in May under the government program, but more modifications were canceled as well. Some of those borrowers worked out alternative terms with private lenders.

LA 144853.jpg

A distressed home awaits a buyer in Davie, Fla. Mortgage servicers have been pressured by the government to make more loan modifications permanent. (J Pat Carter, Associated Press / May 12, 2010)
By Jim Puzzanghera, Los Angeles Times

Reporting from Washington —

More borrowers dropped out of the Obama administration’s foreclosure prevention program last month than were added, but many of those homeowners found private help from their mortgage companies, according to data released Monday.

The number of mortgages with permanently reduced payments under the Home Affordable Modification Program increased 15% in May to 340,459. The pace of new temporary three-month modifications eased in May, with an increase of just 2.5% to 1,244,184.

But cancellations of mortgage modifications continued to grow. Canceled trial modifications rose 55% in May from April. More than a third of all trial modifications started since the program began last year — 429,696 — now have been canceled.

Cancellations of permanent modifications also were up sharply, rising 70% to 6,357 in May from April.

But overall, homeowners with permanently reduced mortgage payments have fared better in the program. The cancellations amount to just 1.8% of all the permanent modifications offered since the program began last year.

The administration’s report said that at the eight largest mortgage servicers, including Bank of America, CitiMortgage and JPMorgan Chase, nearly half of homeowners whose temporary government modifications were cancelled received an alternative modification.

Of the 194,056 total cancellations for those servicers under the Obama administration’s plan, just 7% resulted in foreclosure actions. An additional 2% resulted in a short sale.

The Los Angeles-Orange County area continued to account for the most active trial and permanent modifications under the administration program, with 52,119, or 6.4% of the national total. The New York City area was second with 6.1%. The Inland Empire ranked fourth with 5%.

The $75-billion Home Affordable Modification Program offers mortgage servicers cash incentives to reduce mortgage holders’ payments. The goal is to modify the mortgages for 3 million to 4 million people by the end of 2012. The median payment reduction in permanent modifications has been about $500 a month.

But the program has been criticized for not helping enough homeowners and for slow participation and bureaucratic runarounds by major mortgage servicers.

Administration officials increased pressure on mortgage servicers in December to make more of the modifications permanent.

As part of that process, the administration reviewed cases in which some servicers denied mortgage modifications. Officials agreed with most of the decisions, but in 3.9% of the cases, reviewers disagreed with the servicers’ decisions and ordered the firms to hold off on foreclosure action until the cases were reevaluated.

jim.puzzanghera@latimes.com
Copyright © 2010, The Los Angeles Times