5 steps to first-time-buyer happiness

Finding best home depends on preapproval, agent
By Dian Hymer, Inman News
Posted: 01/27/2011 11:13:51 AM PST
Updated: 01/27/2011 11:43:05 AM PST

The first step in the homebuying process is to find out what you can afford to pay for a house, condo or co-op. This will depend on the amount of cash you have available for a down payment, your credit, income, assets and overall financial situation.
Mortgage qualification is easier for buyers who work as employees whose income can be easily verified. Self-employed individuals or buyers with income from investments may find the qualification process more difficult.

A wrinkle in the financing end of the homebuying process is that it’s not as easy to get a preapproval letter from your mortgage broker or loan agent as it used to be. As of Jan. 1, 2010, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) began requiring lenders and mortgages brokers to issue a binding Good Faith Estimate (GFE) within three days of receiving a loan application.

Before then, buyers shopped around for a mortgage. When they saw a house they wanted to buy, they asked their loan agent or broker to provide a preapproval letter to accompany their purchase offer. The loan person would run a credit check and verify the buyers’ income and assets without, in many cases, taking a formal loan application. On the basis of this information, a preapproval letter was written.

Read the full article here

Additionally; this article fits in well with the Orange County Market Update Video that we shoot weekly, and it’s our tip of the week. Check out our Anaheim Hills Market Update here…

Home seizures by banks decline in state

Trash litters the front yard of a bank-owned home in Phoenix. Arizona was among the states hardest hit by the housing meltdown. (Joshua Lott, Reuters / January 13, 2011)

Los Angeles Times

While foreclosures climbed 2% nationally, California saw a 14% drop. But California’s high unemployment rate and resetting loans mean the fall in foreclosure activity could be brief.

Fewer Californians grappled with foreclosure last year, bucking a national trend and giving homeowners fresh hope that the state’s housing market could be on the mend.

Trash litters the front yard of a bank-owned home in Phoenix. Arizona was among the states hardest hit by the housing meltdown. (Joshua Lott, Reuters / January 13, 2011)

Fewer Californians grappled with foreclosure last year, bucking a national trend and giving homeowners fresh hope that the state’s housing market could be on the mend.

The 14% drop in foreclosure activity contrasted with a 2% rise nationally, according to data tracking firm RealtyTrac. Analysts noted that California’s housing market was among the first to falter and may now be among the first to recover. Home prices here hit bottom in April 2009, and have gradually risen since then.

Read the full story

If you follow my blog at all… I have a few questions for you. How can anyone know what media forum is correct? Did you see my post yesterday about 1 million homes foreclosed in 2011? While this article is more geographically specific, I would question how accurate is this data, and is it really an issue or a concern to me?

Rather than have uncertainty in the future market, ask yourself, how long am I going to live in my next home? How comfortable am I with my current job, with my current mortgage or rent payment? We have no control over the market; however we as consumers have full control over our individual plans, thoughts and actions.

1 million homes repossessed in 2010

chart_repo.top

CNN Money – recent post:

Foreclosures were at a record high in 2010, and more than 1 million people lost their homes, even as notices started leveling off during the end year.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Foreclosures were at a record high in 2010, and more than 1 million people lost their homes, even as notices started leveling off during the end year.

In total, there were nearly 2.9 million foreclosure notices filed during the year, according to report released Thursday by RealtyTrac. That was a record high, but just 1.7% above 2009.

read the full story

A few key comments in the article address the temporary hold on foreclosures during the 4th quarter of last year, which will lead to increased foreclosure activity 1st and 2nd quarter this year, along with the challenges the banks are experiencing with squatters moving into the vacant properties. Great information!!!

Existing home sales jump 12 percent

As seen on… CNN Money – By Blake Ellis, staff reporterJanuary 20, 2011: 11:01 AM ET

Sales of existing homes jumped in December, marking the fifth month of gains in the past six months, based on an industry report released Thursday.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Sales of existing homes jumped in December, marking the fifth month of gains in the past six months, based on an industry report released Thursday.

Previously-owned home sales climbed 12.3% in December to an annual rate of 5.28 million, from 4.70 million in November, according to the National Association of Realtors.

Read the full story here

Great information; however this is not local. Experience shows that the Orange County market has one of the quietest Decembers in years past. January is off to an amazing start and it’s expected that the unit’s sold this month will be close to record highs. What does this mean to you? If you are an entry level buyer in Orange County, be prepared. Be Pre-Approved and be in a position to make a decision when the time comes. If you have specific questions about what you will need to do, simply send me a quick email and I’m happy to help you any way that I’m able.

Real Estate: Finally a Good Investment?

As posted by: Smart Money

Real Estate: Finally a good investment?
The housing market still looks pretty bleak: There were a record 1 million foreclosures last year, home prices are still falling in many regions, and the number of “underwater” properties is at a record high.

And things don’t look much better in other areas of real estate. The number of construction jobs continues to decline, even as other parts of the economy have added jobs. And mortgage rates have moved higher as long-term Treasury yields have backed up during the past few months.

Basically, the real estate market remains a mess.

Real estate encompasses a wide range of markets – homes, apartments, hospitals, office buildings, strip malls, dormitories and other properties. But for our purposes, let’s focus on residential real estate, or homes. Here are four reasons to think residential real estate might represent a bargain – with one big caveat.

MAKING SENSE OF THE STORY FOR CONSUMERS

• Everyone hates homes – When the housing market is in the doldrums, people tend to avoid thinking about the value of their home. Sellers complain they’re not getting offers and buyers bemoan the strict lending requirements. However, prospective buyers should be contrarian and take advantage of a down housing market.

• Smart people are buying real estate – A prominent hedge-fund manager said in a speech last fall: “If you don’t own a home, buy one. If you own a home, buy another one, and if you own two homes, buy a third and lend your relatives the money to buy a home.” He believes that interest rates and home prices will rise this year, so real estate bargains won’t last much longer.

• Real estate performs well during inflation – Convention says Treasury Inflation Protected Securities, commodities, and real estate do well in an inflationary environment. Real estate performed well during the period in the 1970s, when persistent inflation and high unemployment occurred.

• Demand may be coming back – Job creation and getting people employed are the two major factors in the housing rebound. There’s much debate about when the job market will recovery. Optimists say the recovery will happen this year, while pessimists say it won’t happen for several years.

Read the full story… click here.

House Appraisals Under Fire

Gary Cohen's home in Century City, Calif.

Here we go again… we have discussed Automated Appraisals (- Computer Generated Appraisals) in the past and we are still experiencing the same challenges.

Computerized Models Are Assailed as Inaccurate; There Goes the Credit Line – By M.P. MCQUEEN

Home appraisals, which were blamed for being too generous during the housing boom, are now being criticized by some homeowners for being too stingy, preventing them from refinancing or borrowing against their houses.

The criticism is being leveled at computerized real-estate appraisals, which depend on models that use prices from home sales and other data to determine the value of a house. Because of the volatility in the housing market, they are underestimating prices, some homeowners, real-estate agents and fee appraisers say.

Gary Cohen, of West Los Angeles, Calif., says Citibank suspended his $510,000 home-equity line of credit based on a drop in his home's estimated value after performing a computerized appraisal.

Lenders use computerized appraisals primarily for home-equity loans, preapprovals for mortgage refinancing, loan modifications and mortgage originations of less than $250,000. Automated appraisals are cheaper and faster than in-person appraisals. They run as little as $20, whereas appraisals done by people can cost hundreds of dollars.

The computerized models are used as a check on in-person appraisals, which often were too generous during the housing boom, according to federal banking regulators and state attorneys general. The regulators said banks often held sway over appraisers, encouraging them to value homes at certain prices in exchange for future business. In the wake of the housing bust, regulators imposed tough new rules, prohibiting banks from picking individual appraisers for individual properties.

“The selling point was that [computerized appraisals] were faster and not prone to bank pressure,” says Steven Kane, a Colorado commercial and residential appraiser who is the author of two books on how to apply automated valuation models.

Computerized appraisals calculate a home’s value by using an index derived from historical repeat-sales data, or sales records of homes with similar property characteristics, such as square footage and the number of bedrooms and baths. In-person appraisals don’t incorporate as much transactional data as a computer model.

Gary Cohen, an advertising-sales manager in West Los Angeles, Calif., says Citibank suspended his $510,000 home-equity line of credit based on a drop in his home’s estimated value.

A computer model used by the bank showed his home had dropped to just over $1 million in 2009 from the $1.65 million it was appraised at four years earlier.

So, Mr. Cohen, 65 years old, paid $750 for an in-person appraisal from a firm designated by the bank. It estimated his home was valued at $1.3 million, but Citibank still wouldn’t reinstate his credit line.

“The discrepancy is so great that you have to know whatever method they are using is not accurate,” Mr. Cohen says.

Mr. Cohen sued Citibank, a unit of Citigroup Inc., over the appraisal. In court documents, Citibank said that even if his home is worth the higher figure, the bank has a legal right to suspend the credit line.

Gary Cohen's home in Century City, Calif.

“Citibank continues to believe the suit has no merit and intends to defend its position vigorously,” said a spokesman.

Borrowers also have sued J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Wells Fargo & Co. and other big lenders, claiming that banks are misusing automated valuation models in order to cut home-equity lines of credit. J.P. Morgan Chase and Wells Fargo declined to comment.

Automated valuation models were pioneered by Yale economist Robert Shiller, who developed the first systems in the early 1990s. While arguing that these appraisals are more objective than human appraisers, Mr. Shiller and others say that in some situations the models may be providing unrealistically low values, prompting lenders to reject loan applications or lend less money on particular properties.

Some models weigh past sales of a particular property over time against a historical home-price index, and they are running into problems with properties that have been bought only once. That is the situation in places such as Nevada and Southern California, where new subdivisions sprouted during the housing boom but many homes never sold or entered foreclosure before ever being sold in a nondistressed transaction.

“The main difficulty is that I need two or more sales prices for a property, and if I’m not able to find it, it doesn’t fit into the sample used to calculate the index,” says David Stiff, chief economist at Fiserv, one of the largest providers of automated appraisals using this methodology.

Prof. Shiller concedes there can be problems with these appraisals if a too-short period of historical data is programmed into models.

“In a slow market, it might suggest that prices are going to be falling for a while,” he says.

Other computerized models break down the particular characteristics of a property—number of bedrooms and bathrooms—as well as sales of comparable homes, to arrive at a value estimate. They often are hampered by a lack of accurate or comprehensive data in county and municipal records. Improvements, for example, are recorded by building permits, so if homeowners don’t file permits, the records won’t be accurate.

These models can “change a lot, depending on which variables you include or exclude, so there can be a bias,” says Prof. Shiller.

Bottom line… I believe that the lender is really not obligated to lend money on the property regardless of the value, and the fact that the borrower provided a second appraisal… if the borrower desires, they can go to another lender and get a cash out refinance. Your thoughts???

When will housing come back in California? Five experts offer their views

In Mission Crest, 373 homes — nearly 40% of those in the housing development — had been lost at one point to foreclosure, the San Bernardino County assessor's office said. About 100 lots had been left graded and bare. (Katie Falkenberg, For The Times / May 18, 2010)

A Great Article about market recovery as seen in the LA Times. – By Alejandro Lazo

Foreclosures in the state are still high. Sales of new homes are at historic lows. And millions of homeowners are underwater on their mortgages. So what’s the outlook for 2011 and beyond?

In Mission Crest, 373 homes — nearly 40% of those in the housing development — had been lost at one point to foreclosure, the San Bernardino County assessor's office said. About 100 lots had been left graded and bare. (Katie Falkenberg, For The Times / May 18, 2010)

As housing recoveries go, this one is in need of a cure.

Homeownership — and the buying and selling of residences — is an economic keystone that carries overwhelming weight in Californians’ personal sense of financial well-being.

But the momentum of the state’s housing rebound has faltered, with sales falling and prices softening despite bargain-basement interest rates. Foreclosures in California are still high. Sales of new homes are at historic lows. The construction sector is in the doldrums. And millions of the state’s homeowners owe more on their mortgages than their properties are worth.

Save Up to 90%: Sign up for our free daily e-mail to get in on exclusive deals around L.A. Powered by Groupon. Subscribe Now.

Real estate historically has helped give a boost to economies exiting a recession, but the severity of this bust is nearly unprecedented: Californians have lost $1.73 trillion worth of equity in their homes since prices peaked in 2007, according to Moody’s Economy.com.

Although California’s housing market free-fall ended in spring 2009, the weakness after the expiration of federal tax credits for buyers last year has called into question the sustainability of the recovery.

The Times asked five California experts for their take on the state of real estate and what they think is needed to get the housing market moving again. They range from the pessimism of a foreclosure specialist to the decidedly more upbeat view of a Realtor association economist.

• Richard Green, director of the USC Lusk Center for Real Estate, predicts home prices will remain flat in 2011.

California’s recovery will hinge on location, said Green, who held professorships at several universities and worked as a principal economist at Freddie Mac before becoming director of the Lusk center.

“Draw a line from El Centro up to Sacramento and think of all the towns up and down that line. Unless we have hyperinflation in general in the economy — prices going up a lot — I would guess that in my lifetime we will not see a return to the prices that we had at the peak,” Green said.

“Now, places like La Jolla, Malibu, Laguna, Huntington Beach, Atherton, Palo Alto, the city of San Francisco, Marin County, those are places where within the next five years I could easily imagine prices returning to their peak.”

“The markets in the Central Valley were much more bubbly than the markets on the coast,” he said. “You have very few people who make a lot of money in these places.”

“Whereas a place like Silicon Valley, or a place like West Los Angeles, there is a critical mass of very high-income people.… That means you have a large number of people who can afford to spend in the neighborhood of $1 million on a house, and these are desirable places.”

“The more a property is a commodity that you can easily substitute for something else, the less the chance it will ever come back to its peak. The rarer a property is, the more likely it’s going to come back quickly.”

• Leslie Appleton-Young, chief economist for the California Assn. of Realtors, predicts home prices will rise 2% in 2011.

There are few professionals who would like more to see the housing market bounce back to the heady days of old than Realtors. Real estate agents made a killing when the housing market soared and then took a pounding when it tanked.

During the boom years, Appleton-Young said, she espoused the theory that rising prices mattered more than making solid loans. That theory appeared correct as long as values kept rising.

“What happened this time was prices plummeted and everyone was in trouble,” she said.

These days, the economist sees little chance of the market returning to its previous heights anytime soon.

“We are in a very slow-moving recovery with prices stabilized at the moderate and low end,” Appleton-Young said. “We are still seeing price attrition and price softening at the upper ends of the market.”

2011 will be lackluster, she said, but that does not mean California is not improving.

“We are almost two years into a price recovery. The problem is not to look at 2007 as the normal market that you are moving back up to, because it wasn’t a normal market. We are back in an underwriting environment that actually makes sense.”

“You are seeing prices recovering throughout the state,” she added. “It is just going to take time.”

• Bruce Norris, president of Norris Group in Riverside, expects home prices to fall 5% in 2011.

The real estate slump has been good to Norris, an investor in foreclosed homes. But he believes the market is being artificially boosted by government programs and is set to fall further this year.

“We are in an artificial recovery,” Norris said. “It’s government controlled and manipulated. We have extremely favorable interest rates that we really should not have, based on our debt. We have supported real estate with tax rebates, and we have prevented inventory from showing up by allowing people to be two and three years behind on their mortgages.”

Foreclosed homes, in particular, are being kept off the market through loan modification attempts and other policies.

“You’ve had a slew of programs trying to prevent inventory from showing up, and that prevents reality from happening,” Norris said. “It’s definitely standing in the way of the natural process.”

What does the housing market need most?

“Demand for houses,” Norris said. “Somebody able to qualify for a loan and actually being able to get it. And that’s why it is not going to happen.”

• Emile Haddad, chief executive of FivePoint Communities Inc., expects home prices to “stabilize” in 2011 but declined to make a specific price prediction.

Determining whether the housing market is on steady footing is essential to developers such as Haddad, the former chief investment officer for Lennar Corp. Haddad, along with Lennar, is now part owner of FivePoint, which is managing the development of the Valencia community in Los Angeles County and other high-profile projects. He believes a recovery has yet to take hold in California.

“We are bumping along the bottom,” Haddad said. “And that is a good thing, because that is the first thing that you need in order to start seeing a housing recovery. You need to have a period where values are not going down and the trend is moving in a different direction.”

California’s coastal markets will come back once the job market returns, he said, lifting consumer confidence. But California’s inland areas are more likely to lag behind, and builders will have to reconsider the kind of product they offer in such places.

“In the Central Valley, values have changed a lot,” Haddad said. “You are not going to be able to really have enough depth in the market to sell large, expensive homes, because the ceiling of value is way down.”

“If you pick on a market like Orange County,” he said, “it is still a place that once people feel confident…. I believe people will be out buying homes.”

Affordability is working in the market’s favor.

“We have a mortgage environment that is more favorable — the rates are down — but people are not able to get mortgages, and that is not helping. The most important thing we need is jobs and job creation.”

“Affordability is something I look at, and obviously that is a very attractive metric right now…. There is a value proposition out there right now that is very attractive, that we haven’t seen in four decades.”

• Christopher Thornberg, founding principal of Beacon Economics, predicts home prices will remain flat in 2011.

Once a senior economist for the UCLA Anderson Forecast, Thornberg was one of the first to predict the housing crash, pointing to prices that were way out of line with what people earned.

In that vein, he views the plunge in home values as its own recovery of sorts “because that is when prices went from stupid-high levels to levels that made sense again,” Thornberg said. “Now we are in a post-recovery recovery, if you will.”

“This is not the bust. A bust implies that prices have fallen to levels that are too low. And I would argue that prices today are relatively high. It’s interest rates that have given us this degree of affordability, and from that perspective that is why I don’t expect prices to come down.”

Since helping found Beacon in 2006, Thornberg has become chief economist for state Controller John Chiang and chair of the Controller’s Council of Economic Advisors. He serves on the advisory board of New York hedge fund Paulson & Co. He has been a forceful critic of the Obama administration’s policy attempts to right the market.

“The administration has tried, through a variety of policy methods, to try and spike the market,” he said.

alejandro.lazo@latimes.com
Copyright © 2011, Los Angeles Times

Bull vs. Bear: Will housing rebound?

bull vs bear

An interesting read to say the least… let me know your thoughts!
As seen in CNN Money – Posted by Nin-Hai Tseng, writer-reporter- December 27, 2010

It’s a question many Americans want answered: Will the value of my home rise or fall next year? Smart minds fall in both camps — here are both sides of the coin on real estate.

One of the most closely watched sectors in 2011 will continue to be real estate – a wildly emotional and divisive topic that’s puzzled investors and economists since the housing bubble burst around 2007. Earlier this year, many observers thought the market would turn around in a big way as federal tax credits spurred home purchases and the economy added jobs following hundreds of billions of dollars of government stimulus spending.

As the end of the year approaches, the prospects of a real recovery look much dimmer. For one, it’s become clear that we won’t see a true rebound until we have job growth. With unemployment showing few signs of improvement so far, the bullish take on housing seems hard to swallow, especially when many experts say home prices still have room to fall before hitting bottom.

But a bullish take doesn’t necessarily mean that prices would significantly rise. These are unprecedented times, and even the more cheery views fall short of predicting a steady surge in home values.

Here’s a bullish and bearish look at real estate for 2011.

Bull: Buy real estate!

One of the most vocal bulls on housing for 2011 has been Bill Ackman, founder and CEO of hedge fund Pershing Square Capital Management. At the Value Investing Congress in November, Ackman made a bold presentation called “How To Make A Fortune,” highlighting why it’s the right time to invest in real estate.

Ackman laid out several reasons but some key points include: With the fall in home prices and mortgage rates still relatively low, affordability is at its highest level in decades. What’s more, while there’s clearly still a glut in the supply of unoccupied homes, it will start to decline given that the rate of home construction is at historic lows.

Some of Ackman’s points sound similar to the reasons billionaire investor Warren Buffett gave earlier this year for his prediction that the real estate slump would end by about 2011.

Of course, this doesn’t mean he thinks home prices will return to their 2007 peak. In Buffett’s annual letter to shareholders of his Berkshire Hathaway (BRKA), which owns real-estate brokerage and manufacturer Clayton Homes, he predicted that demand for homes would catch up with supply following a period where the glut of unsold property caused home construction to dramatically fall.

In 2009, housing starts (the supply side) were 554,000 – by far the lowest number in the 50 years for which Berkshire could date. “Paradoxically, this is good news,” Buffett wrote.

And with home prices falling, he said families who couldn’t afford to buy a few years ago would finally be able to afford to do so. Buffett put it this way: “Prices will remain far below ‘bubble’ levels, of course, but for every seller (or lender) hurt by this there will be a buyer who benefits.”

It’s anyone’s guess if Buffett’s position on housing will change much in his letter to shareholders next year. It also remains to be seen if Ackman will continue to trump his “How to Make a Fortune” pitch with the recent rise in mortgage rates. For now, at least, both investors see promise in housing.

Bear: What bottom?

While home prices have for the most part stopped their freefall, some economists believe they haven’t hit bottom yet.

Rick Sharga, a senior vice president at RealtyTrac, an online marketplace for foreclosure properties, recently told The Wall Street Journal that foreclosures for 2011 could top the estimated 1.2 million bank repossessions this year, which reflected an increase of 900,000 from 2009. This is partly due to the so-called “robosigning” mess that forced some lenders to stall a flurry of foreclosures.

While Sharga predicts that home prices nationally could still fall by about 5%, others say they could drop much more at about 10%.

Some might argue that further declines coupled with relatively low mortgage rates might just spur a flurry of home purchases, but Daryl Jones, an analysts at investment research firm Hedgeye says that’s unlikely given that credit standards at virtually all major lenders are much higher and typically require larger down payments that would actually add to costs. Jones also thinks that home prices could fall another 15% to 30%, which means homes are actually still overpriced and might not attract more buyers as Ackman argues.

And while home construction is at all-time lows, Hedgeye says the trend is probably not as promising as Buffett and Ackman might think. The supply of housing is still very high – the firm estimated in November that there’s still 11 months of supply on the market to absorb, which is close to levels seen in 2009.

With so many variables working against the housing market, the bearish takes becomes all the more convincing. But one can always hope they’re wrong.

What do the banks know… that the typical home sellers may not?

pricing chart

If you are thinking about selling your home, you must read this! The typical equity seller must be willing to think, act and behave just like a bank owned home or risk facing the consequences…

This post comes from a recent experience with a negotiator on a listing that I have had for about the past 70 days… The listing has had great activity, the property has tons of upgrades, and we have reduced the price on multiple occasions, yet still… no offers. The negotiator, time after time has made dramatic price adjustments, offered incentives to the buyer, and to the selling agent! What does he know about the market that the typical seller might not?

The reason that I’m sharing this with you is to better help you… in today’s market the savvy home-seller will need to take all aspects of the market into consideration, make quick decisions and maybe even go so far as offer incentives in order to secure the highest price possible in the least amount of time.

You may be asking yourself… but if I offer incentives, how will that yield me the highest price? Doesn’t that affect my bottom line? Well of course it does… however experience shows that the longer you wait to sell your home the less likely you are to achieve anywhere near your desired sales price or an inflated sales price. This has proven to be true, over and over again. In fact, most real estate marketing companies will show you a timeline graph that addresses this issue right up front when they provide you with a comprehensive analysis.

Right now, you are probably thinking or saying to yourself, yes but my home has this feature, and my home is located here and quite a few other comments and thoughts may be running rampant. Please gather them. Go ahead… I’ll wait.

Now, I will say this in the nicest, most authentic, loving way possible… The market doesn’t care if you are the nicest home, if your home has the best upgrades, the best location, or a specific amenity that you love that your neighbors don’t have… these are just items that enhance a homes ability to sell in a down or compromised market.

So again, I ask what does this mean to you?

In order to be in the game today, in our current market, you home will have to show well, be priced well, and you have to be in a position to make decisions based on facts and not on emotions.

You absolutely must align yourself with a skilled consultant, a focused negotiator and a person like me that has the ability to organize all the details of the transaction and see things from multiple perspectives. Then and only then, will you reach your desired outcome, your goals and the light at the end of your tunnel. If you are looking for a consultation or would like to discuss this further, simply leave a comment or give me a call. I will look forward to hearing from you.

If you are already on the market, I sincerely wish you well with your home sale!

Banks are in a difficult situation…

Dangerous Waters sign at Dam


Banks and the government have struggled to get the current foreclosure situation under control. The modification programs have helped many families avoid foreclosure. However, the number is but a small percentage of those incapable or unwilling to pay their mortgage. This has resulted in an ever increasing number of bank owned foreclosures (REOs).

The banks are in a difficult situation. If they release this inventory of discounted properties to the market too quickly, it could crush prices causing even more foreclosures. If they release it too slowly, any housing recovery would be further delayed. Imagine a dam, and look at the foreclosures as water behind the dam. The banks needed to find the perfect amount of water they could release to feed the river below but not flood the valley.

This past summer banks finally found that perfect number – not too many, not too few – that the market could handle. Being confident that they had a handle on the challenge, banks increased their repossessions of delinquent properties. Repossessions were up 49 % in August. September set an all-time record for reposed homes. However, in their haste to build that inventory, they got sloppy with their procedures.

When this was revealed, both private and government institutions mandated that the banks declare a moratorium on foreclosures until the irregularities were corrected.

In essence, they put a cork in the dam.

The banks have now revised their procedures and feel comfortable with the accuracy of their paperwork. They will begin to release foreclosures after the first of the year.

The cork is about to be removed.

What will this do to prices?

Both the Bank of America and Fannie Mae have projected that house prices will fall dramatically at the end of the first quarter of 2011 and then slowly move upward through the rest of the year. Why the dramatic drop in values after the start of the year? Perhaps the people in control of the cork know exactly when it will be removed and realize the short term implications.

Bottom Line

There is currently a window of opportunity to sell your home before the discounted properties again re-enter the market and put downward pressure on prices. If you plan to sell within the next year, now might be the time.